Scotland could become the new Cuba

January 10th, 2012

Talk of Scottish independence is moving up the political agenda. A simplistic, broad brush look at the economics of an independent Scotland looks a bit like this…On one hand the Scots would probably gain access to the oil revenues which are currently gobbled up by Her Majesty’s Treasury. On the other hand they would lose the “extra” public spending Scotland enjoys from the wider UK coffers.

All of which means that Scotland becomes less dependent on the UK but much more dependent on oil. All at a time when North Sea oil production is declining.

So almost before the independence celebrations have subsided Scotland will be critically addicted to oil – just as Cuba was critically dependent on Soviet support and oil.

So be careful what you wish for…

Royal Institute of Town Planners discussion paper on peak oil

January 6th, 2012

The Royal Institute of Town Planners issued a discussion paper on peak oil this week. Having recently had some direct experience of the strange world that planners inhabit I hope that planning officers across the country read this and think about how the real world will run into the effects of peak oil sooner than they realise…

http://www.rtpi.org.uk/download/13400/Report-Final.pdf

Oil price the real cause of global financial crisis

December 2nd, 2011

The FT reported this week that the cost of oil imports to the EU has increased from $280bn in 2010 to $402bn this year.
To put this in perspective compare this to the total external debt owed by Greece at the moment. The increase in oil price this year equates to almost a quarter the total Greek debt.
That is a significant increase by anyone’s standards. Some economists have suggested that this new higher oil price is the real stress factor behind the current global growth crisis.

Smoke screen on climate change

December 1st, 2011

The huge U.S. oil company Exxon have, for years, been sponsoring lobby groups specifically to shed doubt on the body of scientific evidenence showing that climate change is man made.

A May 2007 report by Greenpeace USA concludes that, in 2006, Exxon spent $2.1 million on 41 groups that are part of the climate change denial and disinformation campaign. The report says Exxon had given $22 million to these groups since 1998.

After being held to account for this, ExxonMobil said it would cut funds to several groups that “divert attention” from the need to find new sources of clean energy in its 2008 corporate citizenship report.

But a list published by Exxon in July 2010 showing its “2009 worldwide contributions and investments” revealed that it had given four cosponsors of the International Conference on Climate Change (a deniers forum) a total of $275,000. It also gave $1 million to 20 other skeptic groups.

In short Exxon keep saying their sponsorship of these groups of climate change deniers has ceased.

Their work has been very effective.  There is an overwhelming body of evidence that climate change is real and is man made.  Without going into the ins and outs to claim that it isn’t is like claiming that the world is still flat!

But all they need to do is shed doubt and uncertainty.

Once they’ve done that, the chap in the pub can go back to his pint in the ‘certain’ knowledge that there is nothing to worry about.

We all listen out for the things we want to hear.  We don’t necessarily stop to find out who is telling us and, more importantly, why.

U.S. military goes green

October 15th, 2010

This is a really interesting article showing how the U.S. military is adopting fossil fuel conservation measures to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia said ”We’re not going green just for green’s sake. Energy reform and the new energy future aren’t about politics or slogans”.

He also said, “It’s about protecting the lives of our troops. It’s about making our military better and more capable fighters. It’s about making our country more secure and more independent. That’s why we are doing this, that’s why we have to change.”

It appears that fuel supply convoys have been targeted by militant forces leading a recognition that U.S. operations in Afghanistan could be vunerable if supplies of fuel were significantly disrupted.  Fossil fuels are the U.S.’s largest import into Afghanistan.

The full article is here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101013/pl_afp/uspoliticsmilitaryenergyenvironment

So you think peak oil is nonsense?

October 15th, 2010

So you think peak oil is nonsense?

Have a look at this graph showing historic oil prices including one with an adjustment for inflation.

As you’d expect, the price falls as we get better at getting it out of the ground.

The first peak on the right hand side is the 1973 oil crisis which was triggered by an OPEC oil embargo.

To the right of the 1973 spike is roughly where we are now.

The price of oil peaked in the middle of 2008 when it hit a record $147 a barrel.  Since then the global recession has restricted demand so the price has fallen.

You’d have to be quite an optimist to imagine that the price will settle back down to the sort of levels seen in the mid 20th century.

Peak Oil isn’t about running out of oil – we’ll always produce oil.  Rather, Peak Oil is about running out of cheap oil.

Cheap oil that has enabled the cost of food production to come down through more mechanisation, fertilisers and pesticides.  The reduced cost of food has allowed the world population to swell to almost seven billion.

To put this into context, when drilling for oil began to fuel the agricultural revolution (which had started about 100 years earlier in the late 18th century) the world population was only around a billion.

But that is only half of the story.  Having made it through the trials of the two large scale mechanised world wars in the first half of the twentieth century the latter part of the twentieth century saw much of the global population launch themselves headlong into a culture of consumption – fueling the demand for goods from around the world.

So now we have more people than ever before consuming more than ever before; and its all underpinned by our ability to produce cheap oil.

So what happens when the price of oil goes up?  Well normally there is a recession.  We’ve just had one of those.

The recession acts as a brake on our oil consumption, the price falls back (look at the graph) and everything’s hunky dory.  But what happens when we get to grips with the recession and demand for oil rises again?  As we come out of recession this time the developing nations like China and India will also be demanding a larger share of the world’s oil production capacity so the price will rise again.

There is evidence to suggest that volatility and a peak in oil prices is actually a precursor to a recession.  Each recession may have its own explanation assigned to it: banking crisis, reduction in government spending after the war, bad monetarist policy but at the end of the day the price of oil also appears to be a factor.

So what happens when we want to ‘put our foot on the gas’ to pull out of recession?  The price of oil spikes very quickly because we don’t have much excess capacity which leads to an increase in the price of goods.  This acts as a brake on the world economy and increases recessionary pressure.  It looks like a very vicious circle to me.

So when you put more than one recession back to back you get an extended period of negative growth which means a general fall in the standard of living.  While for those of us in the West this means delaying the plasma TV upgrade or doing a bit less ‘retail therapy’ the consequences for poorer nations are much more severe.  Areas of the globe with high levels of people living at a subsistence level are likely to see large numbers of people facing the ultimate tragedy.

UK Energy Minister repeats oil shock warning

September 24th, 2010

For the second time in as many months the UK’s energy secretary Chris Huhne has issued a warning of oil price shocks to come. 

Back in July he told the Financial Times that the UK was “very likely” to face an oil shock within the next decade and this message was repeated at a recent Liberal Democrat conference meeting in September.

In the second speech he also said the UK needed to prepare itself for a doubling in the price of oil.

In a hopeful sign that parts of the UK government is starting to seriously engage with the problem of oil supply sustainability he also clearly outlined that all aspects of our communities will be affected saying “The corner shop is affected if we have an oil price shock because the economy is hit very seriously.”

Mr Huhne went on to explain why he felt his party’s traditional opposition to nuclear power would need to be relaxed as he thought nuclear would need to form part of the UK’s energy mix.

He also promised to encourage the take up of energy efficiency measures to reduce our energy consumption.

The striking fact is that his message in the two separate speeches suggest he at least has grasped the fundamental fact that we’re probably already at or near the last days of cheap abundant energy and that we need to prepare ourselves for the changes to come.

Let’s hope he can convince the rest of the coalition government that it’s time to start engaging with this issue at all social and political levels.

UK government admit secret Peak Oil talks

August 27th, 2010

It seems that various parts of the UK government are beginning to engage with the Peak Oil issue at last.

Information obtained under the feedom of information act confirms that the Bank of England and the Ministry of Defence were among attendees at a “peak oil workshop”.

Bearing in mind we keep being told there’s nothing to worry about, that’s quite an interesting pair of invitations!

However, details of what was discussed during the workshop remains secret.  The fact that these discussions are being kept secret hopefully means that real substantive issues are being discussed – the sort of things that will make a real difference but may also have an impact on the UK’s competetive performance.

Maybe this is part of a general move towards key policy makers in the West engaging with this issue, as President Obama said in June 2010 “this is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels is going to take some time…”

Cynics might say that these discussions are just being kept secret just to avoid upsetting the average man in the street but lets hope there’s a bit more too it than that.

President Obama appears to acknowledge peak oil

June 18th, 2010

Well it looks like the penny (or should that be dime?) is finally beginning to drop…

“For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we’ve talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked — not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor. 

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight.”

Not my words but President Obama’s. 

This was part of a speech from the Oval office on 16th June 2010.

He also said:

“This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels is going to take some time…”

His words do seem to suggest that he acknowledges the fact that we have a problem.  Unfortunately, for political purposes, much of rest of his speech focussed on one particular oil related environmental disaster which is happening in the ‘other gulf’ at the moment but, none the less, its a good start.

Lets hope that this signals the beginning of the U.S. “getting with the program” and starting to seriously tackle the long and complex process of reducing our dependency on fossil fuels.

For the full text of his speech see http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/16/us/politics/16obama-text.html?pagewanted=3&ref=politics

While the current spill in the Gulf of Mexico is undoubtedly a tragedy you might want to have a look at this more complete list of oil spills http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_spills

How will we know when Peak Oil is here?

May 21st, 2010

Assuming you understand the logic behind Peak Oil, you will probably agree that it’s a question of when not if we will run out of cheap oil.

Which brought me to think: how will we know when peak oil has happened?

To an extent it depends on what you mean by peak oil.  It’s not as simple as saying, peak oil is when oil reaches $x a barrel.  The effect of speculators on the price of oil can cause wide variations in price that have nothing to do with the cost of production.

How about peak oil being when global oil production starts to reduce year on year?  The problem with this definition is that organisations such as OPEC regularly increase and decrease oil production for political purposes so this isn’t a true reflection of our ability to produce more oil.

So what else could we adopt as a measure so that we can say whether or not peak oil has happened?

What do you think?  You comments would be appreciated…